Hector wrote:
what if u were president of the philippines? u have negative powers too, u wear womens clothes all the time.

Kah Fatt wrote:
Where you get the lies about me? Or you make them up?
I am not a citizen of Philippines, so how to be its president, if only your charter is amended to have foreign president.

Hector wrote:

they are not lies, i saw you yesterday trying on a bra. u know for your comfort.

Kah Fatt wrote:


LIAR !

saayadena wrote:
stupid hector.
can't you talk decently?

Hector wrote:

your wife told me u wear her bras.....u calling ur wife a liar?

RAINE wrote:
Wtf kah fatt, having a female president is not a problem, and while other countries may ONCE HAVE BEEN doing well through their presidential systems, at least phils is not in active war with 4 different countries. Besides, us in denmark clearly seems to be doing much better than any of you guys with your strange presidential systems. The amount of people under the poverty line in denmark is like, 1%. Go figure on that.

Kah Fatt wrote:


Am I talking about Denmark? Why use vulgar initial? You a barbarian?
Is Denmark having an executive president?
Is UK getting better under the skirt of a queen?
Ask why the Jews tried to kill the only executive queen they had?

Kah Fatt wrote:
Is UK getting better under the skirt of a queen?

RAINE wrote:

Vulgar initial? And yeah, I guess I am kind of a babarian :D

No we're not, but we do have our quite active authorities. It's simply about improving on the way things work around the country. It took time, but we were exceptionally fast. How? By improving on the general state of the country, and thereafter by improving on the peoples power. Basically, the very same thing that the phils are doing now, but doing it in such a large country takes time. It has NOTHING to do with the gender of the leader.

Yes, actually they are. Certainly a lot better than they were under any king.

Because they're jews xD Religous people do all kinds of weird stuff I don't understand, they don't need reason or logic, they just call on their god. But that's another discussion.

JV wrote:

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, you do know that we have a Prime Minister that run's the country, right? LOL

And there is nothing wrong with women leaders. You probably won't know who Margaret Thatcher is, seeing as your head is that far up your arse, but she was a major influence in the revival of the British economy during the 80's. Oh, and guess what, she's a woman!

Kah Fatt wrote:


The One holding the country is the head of state.
The British royals ended up in divorces. Is this a good omen?
So the country will just follow the royals, mostly ended up in divorces.

Kah Fatt wrote:

You have not answered whether Denmark has an executive president?

British royals ended up in divorces. This is the ill effect of having a queen. Social problems are aplenty in UK. They have the highest no, of teen mothers, single mothers, lesbians, abortion, divorces, etc etc.

Daughter of Aquino was an unmarried mother.
Sons of Gandhi were killed in their prime.
Son in law of former Sri Lanka female president was murdered and the daughter because president. What good did they achieved?

To know a country, just observe the family of the head of state. If proper, the country is running good. If family has many misfortune, then country is running bad.

Therefore, without a son, Obama is not good for president same as Bush or Clinton.

JV wrote:


OK, listen to me old man, before you begin to discuss about a certain subject matter, first you must know about it. In this case, not are you bloody stupid, you're also a gigantic tool. Let me educate you, you sexist turd.

The Prime Minister is Gordon Brown, who is also the leader of the Labour Party. While we have a constitutional monarchy, The Queen who is technically the head of state, she DOES NOT RUN THE COUNTRY, hence the reason for our Parliamentary System in place. Understand? Comprende?

As for the British Royals ending up in divorce, I'm assuming you're referring to the late Princess Diana and Prince Charles? Listen up, divorce is a fact of life, some people just aren't meant to be together. Divorce is so common, it's hardly a taboo subject unlike it was back in the 1800's when you were born, it's become a fact of life, sad as it may be. That has nothing to do with the ability to run a country. Idiot.

Someone of your ancient age, you woulda thought you had at least some common sense. I'd expect this stupidity from a Hector or someone!